Module Outline (in brief):
Over the ‘long twentieth century’ issues of politics and power have inevitably mediated history writing, and the politics of interpretations has been entangled in larger political conflicts. If history helps constitute identities (of nations, races etc.), rethinking and rewriting histories refashions those identities. Analysing how the rethinking of history reconstitutes the political will offer several productive and novel perspectives on the constitution and discursive power of the political.
Recent Workshops: The City as a Site of the Political (15 – 17. 12.2016 at CSSSC, Kolkata)
earlier Workshop: Professional and Popular Histories: The Politics of Recognition
(18 – 19 April 2016 at CSDS, Delhi)
Fellows 2017: will be up-dated soon
Dr. William Carruthers (15.3. – 31.5.2016): Grounding Independence. Archaeology, Nasser’s Egypt and the Making of the Decolonised World
Dr. Iman Kumar Mitra (1.6. – 31.8.2016): Between Historicity and Contextuality. Bangiya Dhanabijnan Parishad and Vernacularisation of Economics in Early Twentieth Century Bengal
Module Committee (for detailed profiles); for list see below
Such processes can be studied at four levels: First, at the level at which history is linked to the politics of spatialization and re-territorialization. While the making of nation-states has required the subordination of regional voices, the political assertion of the regions has often entailed an attack on nationalist master narratives by means of alternative ‘indigenous’ historiographies. Second, in relation to race and ethnic communities. The constitution of race relations through the writing of race into history, the ways race is represented, naturalized and made normative, and the way the anti-racist struggle has been ex- pressed in the attempt to de-racialize history are issues which open up many comparative perspectives on the relationship between historiography and the political. Third, in relation to the political assertion and demands for recognition of oppressed castes and ethnic and religious minorities. Their attempts to be included in the nation often lead to the rewriting of existing dominant narratives, thereby connecting political struggles with histories of representation. Finally, the close relationship between the histories and politics of ‘aboriginals’ (e.g. in Australia/ New Zealand/US) or Adivasis (India) provides a similarly promising area to study the mutual constitution of history and the political: the assertion of their rights and their entry into the political sphere has invariably involved battles over their respective histories.
The module will concentrate primarily on three areas of inquiry: (a) controversial representations of history in textbooks; (b) the use of specific historical master narratives in films (historical documentaries etc.) and public debates on historical films; (c) heritage politics in the context of colonial rule and postcolonial nation-building. In all these three areas India has been at the centre of recent international debate on ‘history as a political category’. Locating this module in India, therefore, connects it not only to an extremely lively research environment, but also to exciting ongoing public debates on ‘the public life of history’.
- Prathama Bannerjee (CSDS, Delhi)
- Martin Baumeister (MWS/German Historical lnstitute Rome)
- Berber Bevernage (Ghent University, Belgium)
- Neeladri Bhattacharya (Centre for Historical Studies, JNU, New Delhi)
- Eleni Christodoulou (GEI, Braunschweig, Germany)
- Andreas Gestrich (GHIL, London)
- Veena Naregal (IEG, Delhi)
- Lutz Raphael (Trier University)
- Riem Spielhaus (GEI, Braunschweig, Germany)
- Lakshmi Subramanian, (CSSSC, Kolkata)
- Tapati Guha Thakurta, (CSSSC, Kolkata)
- Ravi Vasudevan (CSDS, Delhi)